I don't think you guys really understand what Net Neutrality is, and you definitely have it backwards in regards to the censorship thing.
I'm actually at a loss as to how one could see Net Neutrality as a killer of free speech. If anything, it's the opposite. It actually prevents ISP's from restricting (or censoring) content and by no means is it a restriction of freedom of speech in and of itself.
You really should read this if you want a better idea as to what it actually is... https://www.eff.org/issues/net-neutrality
Internet service providers, in their great monopolies / duopolies, really do need to be classified as Title II. Like it or not, the internet is a utility. If there was more competition, we wouldn't need Net Neutrality rules, but unfortunately there's not and there likely won't be any competition for quite some time.
Answer me this... Are you ok with the idea of your ISP charging you an extra fee, on top of the already fairly hefty price you pay for internet, for access to different, individual websites you might want to visit?
Educate yourself on what Net Neutrality is and you'll find it's actually a good thing.
Bookmarks